Major Scope

  •  Colon and Rectal Surgery
  •  General Surgery
  •  Gynecologic Oncology
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Neurological Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery
  •  Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine
  •  Neonatal Surgery
  •  Prenatal Surgery
  •  Trauma Surgery
  •  Surgical Intensivists, Specializing In Critical Care Patients
  •  Thoracic Surgery
  •  Congenital Cardiac Surgery
  •  Thoracic Surgery-Integrated
  •  Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Citation: World J Surg Surg Res. 2019;2(1):1111.DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625.1111

Program Directors’ and Trainees’ Attitudes towards the Introduction of Multi-Source Feedback as Part of Surgical Residents’ Formative Assessment Process at the University of Calgary: a Qualitative Study

Artan Reso, Evan Jost, Adrian Harvey and Kirsten Dalrymple

Department of General Surgery, University of Calgary, Canada
Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, UK

*Correspondance to: Artan Reso 

 PDF  Full Text Research Article | Open Access

Abstract:

Introduction: Canadian medical education regulators have expressed the need for multifaceted evaluations. Multisource Feedback (MSF) has been proposed to improve assessment of nontechnical domains as these assessments are challenging. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of residency program directors and residents at the University of Calgary regarding implementation of MSF.
Methods: Semi-structured individual and focused group interviews were used to collect data. Six program directors from surgical disciplines at U of C were individually interviewed, and a focus group interview was conducted with 7 surgical residents. These interviews were transcribed and analysed for recurring themes using a template. These themes were grouped on the template and further analysed.
Results: Several themes were identified. These were: identified need for MSF, organizational ability to apply MSF, benefits associated with MSF, barriers to MSF, and suggestions on implementation. Participants agreed that MSF was necessary to improve evaluations and might address assessment shortcomings. They noted that the infrastructure and willingness to implement MSF is currently in place. MSF would allow improved resident insight into their performance and earlier detection of issues. Barriers were difficulty of communicating negative feedback and lack of infrastructure for remediation. A suggestion for implementation was proper preparation of all participants prior to MSF introduction.
Conclusion: Study participants agree that MSF may improve evaluation at the U of C. They felt that the programs were ready to accept and participate in MSF. Concerns remain regarding remediation of negative behaviours. This may be applied to other institutions wishing to implement MSF.

Keywords:

Multisource feedback; Evaluation; Implementation

Cite the Article:

Reso A, Jost E, Harvey A, Dalrymple K. Program Directors’ and Trainees’ Attitudes towards the Introduction of Multi-Source Feedback as Part of Surgical Residents’ Formative Assessment Process at the University of Calgary: a Qualitative Study. World J Surg Surgical Res. 2019; 2: 1111.

Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 2.466**
  • H-Index: 6
  • ISSN: 2637-4625
  • DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles with Grants

LAMA1 is a Potential Molecule Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Extended High Hilar Resection and Enlarged Hepatic Portal Enterostomy in the Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...