Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.989**
  • H-Index: 6
  • ISSN: 2637-4625
  • DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Hand Surgery
  •  Reconstructive Surgery
  •  Obstetrics & Gynecology
  •  Spine Surgery
  •  Robotic Surgery
  •  Dental Surgery
  •  Surgical Oncology
  •  Cardiothoracic Surgery


Citation: World J Surg Surg Res. 2021;4(4):1333.DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625.1333

Comparison between Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Humeral Diaphysis Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kaisa Lehtimäki1 *, Elina Ekman1 , Aleksi Lager1 and Mikhail Saltychev2

1 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Finland 2 Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Finland

*Correspondance to: Kaisa Lehtimäki 

 PDF  Full Text Research Article | Open Access


Introduction: Humeral diaphysis fractures have traditionally been treated non-operatively using casts or functional bracing. Although non-operative treatment has demonstrated successful outcomes, operative treatment continues to increase. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to show that the operative treatment is superior to non-operative treatment. The aim of the study is to evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of operative vs. non-operative interventions for non-malignant closed fractures of the humeral shaft in adults. Material and Methods: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of randomized controlled trials systematically gathered from Pubmed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus – databases in May 2020. The methodological quality of articles was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s domain-based framework. Random effects meta-analysis was employed. Results: Of 354 records, 176 were screened based on their titles and abstracts and four based on their full texts. Three RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. The average age of the patients varied from 37 to 50 years and the duration of follow-up was one year. The risk of systematic bias was low for two RCTs and high for one. The pooled between-groups difference was measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the Constant-Murray score, and the pain severity level. The proportion of nonunion, differences were 1.9 (95% CI 0.1 to 3.6), 1.8 (95% CI - 1.6 to 5.1, 0.3 (95% CI - 0.2 to 0.8) and 0.1 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.4), respectively. The heterogeneity was low and all the I2 were 0%. Conclusion: No evidence was found to support any clinically significant superiority of operative over non-operative treatment in closed extra-articular humeral shaft fractures. In these situations, non-operative treatment should remain the treatment of choice being less prone to adverse effects than surgery.


Humeral fractures; Shoulder fractures; Arm/surgery

Cite the Article:

Lehtimäki K, Ekman E, Lager A, Saltychev M. Comparison between Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Humeral Diaphysis Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World J Surg Surgical Res. 2021; 4: 1333.

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles with Grants

Correlation Analysis between Cervical Refractory Ureaplasma urealyticum Infection and IVF Pregnancy Outcome
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Analysis of the Significance of DNASE1L3 in Immune Infiltration of Colon Adenocarcinoma
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...