Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 1.989**
  • H-Index: 6
  • ISSN: 2637-4625
  • DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Cardiothoracic Surgery
  •  Anesthesiology
  •  Podiatric Surgery
  •  Obstetrics & Gynecology
  •  Plastic Surgery
  •  Laparoscopic Surgery
  •  Urological Surgery
  •  Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery


Citation: World J Surg Surg Res. 2021;4(1):1341.DOI: 10.25107/2637-4625.1341

Early Results of a Comparative Study of eHealth in Bariatric Surgery

Dirk PA Versteegden1 *, Magaly JJ Van Himbeeck1 , Gerbrand CM van Hout2 , Marieke PW Aarts1 , Linsey MAM van Heugten3 and Simon W Nienhuijs1

1Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 2Department of Psychology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 3Department of Dietary, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

*Correspondance to: Dirk PA Versteegden 

 PDF  Full Text Review Article | Open Access


Background: As eHealth has a hypothetical benefit as additional support, there is a widespread implementation in bariatric trajectories. Knowledge about the key components or objective gain is limited. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the value in the bariatric pathway. Methods: Two-hundred-and-five patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery were randomized to either: Control-group (n=103); online-group (n=50) receiving access to an eHealth platform; or device-group (n=52) who, in addition, received monitoring devices. Here, the 1-year results on convalescence, commitment, eHealth usage and quality of life were assessed. Results: Median hospitalization was 1 day in all groups. Mean days to return-to-work was 28.1 vs. 27.5 vs. 29.8, respectively, p=0.673. Additional physical or telephonic consultations were comparable. Usage of electronical aids, beyond study material, was more frequent in intervention groups. Around 93% of patients used the eHealth platform and approximately half applied the devices regularly. Quality of life improved greatly however did not differ between the groups. Commitment was comparable by questionnaire scores. Conclusion: The addition of eHealth to a bariatric pathway did not lead to improved outcomes of convalescence, commitment and quality of life one-year postoperatively. There was a trend of higher usage of (electronic) aids in the online- and device-group


Obesity; Bariatric surgery; eHealth; Telemedicine

Cite the Article:

Versteegden DPA, Van Himbeeck MJJ, van Hout GCM, Aarts MPW, van Heugten LMAM, Nienhuijs SW. Early Results of a Comparative Study of eHealth in Bariatric Surgery. World J Surg Surgical Res. 2021; 4: 1341..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles with Grants

Etiology-Based Treatment Strategy for Excessive Gingival Display: Literature Review
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Association of Lymphocytes with the Duration of Survival in Artificially Fed Patients with Dysphagia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...